You have no items in your shopping basket.
Key facts and importance
- The ability of children to consent to medical treatment is enshrined in law to safeguard their rights and ensure their well-being.
- In the UK, the principle of Gillick competence, established in the landmark case of Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986), outlines that children under the age of 16 can consent to medical treatment if they have sufficient understanding and intelligence to comprehend the nature and implications of the proposed treatment.
- This area of law is crucial as it balances the need to respect children's autonomy with the duty to protect their best interests, especially in cases where parental consent may be unavailable or contrary to the child's welfare.
Key definitions
- Gillick competence - Refers to the legal capacity of children under the age of 16 to consent to medical treatment based on their understanding and maturity.
- Best interests - A principle guiding decisions involving children, emphasising their welfare, safety, and overall well-being as paramount considerations.
Legislation, regulations, and best practice
- The principle of Gillick's competence is supported by various legal and regulatory frameworks, including the Children Act 1989 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
- The General Medical Council (GMC) provides guidance for healthcare professionals, emphasising the importance of assessing a child's capacity to consent based on their understanding of the treatment, risks, and alternatives.
- Best practice dictates that healthcare professionals should involve children in decision-making processes to the extent appropriate for their age and maturity level, respecting their autonomy while prioritising their welfare.
Understanding Gillick competence
Exploring the legal concept and its implications for children's healthcare rights.
- Assessing capacity - The role of healthcare professionals in determining a child's ability to consent.
- Parental involvement - Balancing parental rights with children's autonomy and best interests.
- Case studies - Real-life examples illustrating the application of Gillick's competence in medical practice.
Recommendations
- Encourage open communication between healthcare providers, parents, and children to facilitate informed decision-making.
- Provide age-appropriate information to children about their medical care to empower them in the decision-making process.
- Educate parents and professionals about the legal framework and ethical considerations surrounding children's consent to medical treatment.
Conclusion
The question of whether children can consent to medical treatment in the UK is not simply a matter of legal technicality; it reflects broader principles of autonomy, protection, and respect for individual rights. By understanding the legal framework, assessing capacity appropriately, and prioritising the best interests of the child, we can ensure that young individuals receive the care they need while respecting their autonomy and dignity.
Click here for comprehensive training on legal and ethical considerations in healthcare, including children's rights and consent, explore our CPD accredited courses and training on ComplyPlus LMS™ from The Mandatory Training Group. Stay up-to-date with the latest regulatory requirements and enhance your professional development.
About the author
Dr Richard Dune
With over 20 years of experience, Richard blends a rich background in NHS, the private sector, academia, and research settings. His forte lies in clinical R&D, advancing healthcare tech, workforce development and governance. His leadership ensures regulatory compliance and innovation align seamlessly.
