Evaluating training effectiveness with the Kirkpatrick Model

The Kirkpatrick Model of Evaluation is a widely used framework for evaluating training programs. It provides a structured approach to assess the effectiveness of training initiatives. The Kirkpatrick Model, developed by Donald Kirkpatrick in the 1950s, provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of training interventions. It consists of four levels of evaluation, each building upon the previous level.

This blog post will discuss the Kirkpatrick Model's four levels and how trainers can use it to gauge success.

Level 1: Reaction

The first level focuses on participants' reactions to the training experience. It measures their satisfaction, engagement, and perceived relevance of the train-the-trainer program. Assessing the effectiveness of training is commonly done through feedback surveys. Although this evaluation strategy requires the least amount of time and budget, it may not provide the most valuable data when it comes to improving your training methods. With this methodology, you would need to take into consideration some key factors, such as the accuracy and honesty of learner responses. While these factors may seem obvious, they may not be enough to help you make informed decisions when revising your training strategy.

Level 2: Learning

In this stage, you would want to know if the training program help participants learn the desired knowledge, skills, or attitudes?" Assessments, quizzes, or observations are used to determine if the training has successfully imparted the desired learning outcomes.

Our Learning Management System (LMS) serves as a tool to measure the effectiveness of your training. For instance, our end-of-course assessments require a minimum score of 80% to pass the course. Through our reporting functions, you can identify which learners are not achieving optimal scores and can identify patterns for areas of improvement. By evaluating the knowledge and skills of individuals before and after undergoing training, it becomes easier to determine which improvements can be attributed to the training experience.

Level 3: Behaviour

Level 3 assesses whether participants apply what they learned in their work environment. This stage usually starts a few months after the training. It focuses on behaviour change and performance improvement. On-the-job observations, performance reviews, and metrics analysis help determine if the training has translated into actual workplace behaviour. In healthcare settings, where safety is paramount, it is essential to observe training methods.

Most people consider this level to be the most accurate measure of a program's effectiveness. However, testing at this level can be difficult because it's not always possible to predict when someone will fully apply what they've learned from their training.

Level 4: Results

Level 4 measures the impact of the training on organisational goals and outcomes. It examines the overall results achieved, such as increased sales or improved customer satisfaction. This level provides the most valuable data but often receives less attention due to its complexity and resource requirements. Isolating the training's impact from external factors, establishing a causal link, and quantifying the results can be difficult. To address these challenges, you would need to track meaningful indicators, use control groups or pre-post comparisons, and calculate the return on investment. When the training initiatives result in measurable outcomes, it becomes evident which methods are most valuable.

Using the Kirkpatrick Model

To effectively utilise the Kirkpatrick Model, start by identifying organisational goals at level 4. Then, define desired behaviours at level 3, followed by knowledge and skills at level 2. Finally, consider participants' reactions at level 1. This systematic approach ensures alignment between training programs and organisational objectives.

Conclusion

In heavily regulated sectors, there are specific laws, standards, and guidelines that need must adhering to. Proper training ensures that employees understand these regulations and can follow them accurately. Failure to comply with regulations can result in severe penalties and damage to an organisation's reputation.

Although the Kirkpatrick Model provides a systematic approach for evaluating training programs at different levels of effectiveness, it doesn’t provide a full picture of staff competency. With the use of integrated compliance systems, you manage your training and increase operational efficiency.

The ComplyPlus CQC Compliance Software is an accredited learning management system that includes a document repository for all your policies and procedures, enabling you to audit and store all your training and compliance documents in one place.

Contact us today for more information about our compliance management solutions.

Contact us

Complete the form below to find out how we can help your organisation with regulatory compliance and governance, statutory and mandatory training, continuous professional development, learning management systems and educational technologies.